Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621460Re: Old word processors
From: Carlos E.R.
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:21
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:21
43 lines
3724 bytes
3724 bytes
On 2018-03-19 18:46, Dave Garland wrote: > On 3/19/2018 10:09 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> WordStar on the other hand was designed for touch typists. But they >> undid that when they designed new versions with different keys (wordstar >> 2000?) >> > I personally thought WordStar 4 was the acme of perfection for PCs, > though the Displaywriter was better. WordPerfect was very popular with > business in the US, in part due to their exceptionally good telephone > support and aftermarket add-ons for the medical and legal professions. > The F-key orientaton slowed me down, but I never used it for production > typing. In the Windows era all of them deteriorated, and required taking > your hand off the keyboard to (which slows touch typists down a lot, and > occasionally resulted in entire paragraphs of gibberish due to their > hand ending up one key off of where it should be) to use the mouse. I > think that the people who marketed and wrote software were hunt-and-peck > typists, and probably correctly assumed that the people who purchased > the software were as well. The people who had to use it, not so much, > back then. Wordperfect 5.x was wonderful. It was the first one I had that handled 9 pin printers perfectly. The page size was correctly calculated even if it contained photos or images. It had a mode to display what would be the result graphically. This rendering was not specially fast. All the wordstar variants I used previously made errors. Later I had to use Windows based word processors. I remember one, what was it... Abipro? amiword? Amipro? The last one does exist in the wikipedia. I don't remember. But all the windows based wordprocessors I tried (except WP) were terrible with pin printers, minutes per page, because they printed graphics instead of letters. But the Windows Word Perfect was not good enough, they did not design it well. It was slow, it crashed, it failed, different interface IIRC... There was a MsDOS word processor that was intended to write math texts properly. I don't remember the name, but I found it difficult to use. A friend of mine used it a lot, said it was the only choice for math. Now he uses Tex. -- Cheers, Carlos.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<49t5oe-7jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni35728wmg.0!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me> <3e05oe-6jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <p8ot29$q5b$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.74.152 with SMTP id n24mr61773wmi.16.1521501849665; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:24:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.26.147 with SMTP id a141ls1992wma.0.canary-gmail; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:24:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.230.84 with SMTP id d81mr62950wmh.12.1521501849005; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni35728wmg.0!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:21:39 +0100 Lines: 43 Message-ID: <49t5oe-7jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me> <3e05oe-6jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <p8ot29$q5b$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net 1oSj84obzcb9MHCjRyrnDw3uR7pxlqcIv2W8WltU2dG2Nlsdus X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:gqZwsZBk8cc7XMrjDfSvWSweMHE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 In-Reply-To: <p8ot29$q5b$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit