Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621449Re: Old word processors
From: Carlos E.R.
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:09
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:09
29 lines
2765 bytes
2765 bytes
On 2018-03-18 19:24, Dave Garland wrote: > On 3/18/2018 8:51 AM, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: > >> At a PPOE the secretaries had to use PC's with DisplayWrite (I,II, 3, 4 ) >> It was 'oribble to a simple programmer like me, used to a program editor. >> Text saved in EBCDIC. The only feature that appealed was "cursor-draw". >> > The DisplayWriter was a fine WP station. It had a Selectric-quality > keyboard, a good (albeit monochrome and character) display, and could > keep up with the fastest typist. There obviously wasn't any > "cursor-draw", since there was no mouse, but a typist doesn't need that > anyhow. The software was solid, saving was pretty much automatic, and I > don't think I ever saw a D'wr crash. > > DisplayWrite was their attempt to recreate that experience for a PC. It > was pretty klunky, and having what was usually a crappy keyboard and a > monochrome monitor (CGA for WP would rot your eyeballs out) that > couldn't handle the symbol characters didn't help. IBM obviously didn't > know what to do when they no longer had control over the hardware. > WordPerfect did things much better (aside from the tendency to assign > functions to F, shift-F, ^F, and alt-F keys in what seemed to be random > order). WordStar on the other hand was designed for touch typists. But they undid that when they designed new versions with different keys (wordstar 2000?) -- Cheers, Carlos.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3e05oe-6jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni34147wmi.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.124.10 with SMTP id x10mr1419697wmc.20.1521472328962; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:12:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.9.1 with SMTP id 1ls1582454wmj.8.gmail; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.237.15 with SMTP id l15mr1451273wmh.1.1521472327920; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni34147wmi.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:09:23 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: <3e05oe-6jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net 0tXtAVfw84Y0xUZZHgSN6AX9XrZ4on/3V1/CnxXH5mxw6bpSKK X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:BJAaklfhhRAqb0ZPuwcsvC0IuOE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 In-Reply-To: <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit