🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621449

Re: Old word processors

#621449
From: Carlos E.R.
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:09
29 lines
2765 bytes
On 2018-03-18 19:24, Dave Garland wrote:
> On 3/18/2018 8:51 AM, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
> 
>> At a PPOE the secretaries had to use PC's with DisplayWrite (I,II, 3, 4 )
>> It was 'oribble to a simple programmer like me, used to a program editor.
>> Text saved in EBCDIC. The only feature that appealed was "cursor-draw".
>>
> The DisplayWriter was a fine WP station. It had a Selectric-quality
> keyboard, a good (albeit monochrome and character) display, and could
> keep up with the fastest typist. There obviously wasn't any
> "cursor-draw", since there was no mouse, but a typist doesn't need that
> anyhow. The software was solid, saving was pretty much automatic, and I
> don't think I ever saw a D'wr crash.
> 
> DisplayWrite was their attempt to recreate that experience for a PC. It
> was pretty klunky, and having what was usually a crappy keyboard and a
> monochrome monitor (CGA for WP would rot your eyeballs out) that
> couldn't handle the symbol characters didn't help. IBM obviously didn't
> know what to do when they no longer had control over the hardware.
> WordPerfect did things much better (aside from the tendency to assign
> functions to F, shift-F, ^F, and alt-F keys in what seemed to be random
> order).

WordStar on the other hand was designed for touch typists. But they
undid that when they designed new versions with different keys (wordstar
2000?)

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3e05oe-6jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni34147wmi.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.124.10 with SMTP id x10mr1419697wmc.20.1521472328962;        Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.28.9.1 with SMTP id 1ls1582454wmj.8.gmail; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.28.237.15 with SMTP id l15mr1451273wmh.1.1521472327920;        Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni34147wmi.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Old word processors
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:09:23 +0100
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <3e05oe-6jb.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net 0tXtAVfw84Y0xUZZHgSN6AX9XrZ4on/3V1/CnxXH5mxw6bpSKK
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BJAaklfhhRAqb0ZPuwcsvC0IuOE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <p8matd$94n$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit