Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621447Re: Old word processors
From: Kerr-MuddJohn
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:51
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:51
80 lines
4962 bytes
4962 bytes
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 06:50:12 GMT, Dave Garland <dave.g...@wizinfo.com> wrote: > On 3/17/2018 4:13 PM, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:56:32 -0700 (PDT), hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com >> wrote: >>> >>> I think almost every programmer prepared some documentation on >>> punched cards and printed it out. >> >> This you can do with any text editor. I do not use LibreOffice here >> when when coding (using vi or Emacs). >> >>>> Apparently the IBM MT/ST (Magnetic Tape/Selectric Typewriter) from >>>> 1964 would match that description which was used only with an IBM >>>> Selectric. But there should had been applications which would not >>>> depend on an external type writer rather than using a dedicated >>>> printer, no? >>> >>> Not sure of your question. The IBM MT/ST and MC/ST was integrated >>> with a Selectric typewriter which provided the keyboard and >>> 'printer'. As others mentioned, they were word processors. >> >> I think I understand a word processor is something you edit a text. >> It assists you by wrapping text and allow modification of characters, >> like bold. Only *after* you are done editing you would print it out >> or save it to a file. You could move paragraphs around and often do >> mail merge. Things a Selectric could not do. > > WP existed with hard-copy IO. There were people who did WP using > teletypes. Yes, CRTs were much nicer, but that's a later development. > > And with an MC/ST you could in fact move paragraphs around, by saving > them separately (the magnetic cards could hold units of text smaller > than a page. But note that such gear was not normally used by writers, > but by secretaries or typists. Authors didn't type their own stuff. > And even if they were capable of it (believe me, most weren't), the > gear was far too expensive to give them their own, and they wouldn't > want to devote the time to training in on it. > > >> The Selectric did not (for my knowledge) had a display. > > Correct. > > Even if it might >> had "write ahead" you could not see what you wrote until it was >> printed on paper. If you made a mistake it was too late. > > Sorta. But the Correcting Selectric had a lift-off tape so you could > backspace an error out. If you're a typist, you probably know without > looking (you're looking at the copy stand, not the typewriter) as soon > as you press the wrong key. So many mistakes could be immediately > corrected without even losing much rhythm. > > Because of that >> typewriters soon vanished after word processors were available in the >> late 70s to early 80s. >> >> Which again raises the question: if word processors were around >> before the 70s, why didn't they supersede typewriters in offices >> already? > > The IBM Displaywriter was IBM's CRT word processor, and came out in > 1982. According to an IBM website, "A system of three displays sharing > a single higher speed printer and a paper handler sold for $26,185 and > leased for $845 a month." (That's $67,555 and $2180 in 2018 dollars. > Granted, it's for 3 workstations sharing a printer.) > > At a PPOE the secretaries had to use PC's with DisplayWrite (I,II, 3, 4 ) It was 'oribble to a simple programmer like me, used to a program editor. Text saved in EBCDIC. The only feature that appealed was "cursor-draw". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_DisplayWrite -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni26180wmi.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.156.138 with SMTP id f132mr958270wme.21.1521381067152; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 06:51:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.133.206 with SMTP id h197ls519668wmd.1.canary-gmail; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 06:51:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.116.6 with SMTP id p6mr946480wmc.5.1521381065907; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 06:51:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni26180wmi.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Kerr-Mudd,John" <nots...@invalid.org> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:51:05 -0000 (UTC) Organization: dis Lines: 80 Message-ID: <XnsA8A98D082B822admin127001@85.214.115.223> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8l274$r1u$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:51:05 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a78067f30588a3613f95a0edd3f2fd24"; logging-data="16149"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EvaJbBXqmySOolSTlQ/mTtCQ2Srupksk=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Cancel-Lock: sha1:lLiiL6DU1Q+bHXYIDKE7nhAcYC0= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit