Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621427Re: Old word processors
From: Charles Richmond
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 02:35
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 02:35
36 lines
3422 bytes
3422 bytes
On 3/25/2018 6:44 PM, JimP wrote: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:50:12 -0400, Andreas Kohlbach > <a...@spamfence.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 22:46:36 -0500, Charles Richmond wrote: >>> >>> On 3/24/2018 3:31 PM, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: >>>> >>>> I still maintain that before the IBM PC, personal computers were >>>> still a specialty niche market. Yes, there were Radio Shack >>>> and Apple computers out there. But in _relative_ terms, the >>>> number of users was still very small. >>>> >>> >>> What you should say is... widespread use of microcomputers in the >>> *business* sector did 8not* occur until the IBM PC. It even took thw >>> slow-witted business managers *years* to realize they could ge much >>> better computers for less money... by purchasing IBM PC clones. >> >> What is with the Osborne and the office software coming along with it? >> Since WordStar and other could run on any Z80 (8080) I assume that at >> least small businesses used it a lot. > > I was finally able to remember/discover online, the name of the Amiga > word processor software: Final Writer. it was great, until I tried > printing. Then it was incredibly slow. > There was a word processor sold by Mark of the Unicorn software. The word processor was called FinalWord. I used it at a PPoE on a Harris 800 computer; the company had a daisywheel printer in a noise housing. The license for using the word processor cost a lot IMHO... -- numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<p99m91$2j8$1@dont-email.me>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!l13ni1017wmd.0!nntp.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <nejuadhun30mn34o7tvqbs6fhaq9d42m9m@4ax.com> <dce9e1b3-38a3-4815-b8e3-f788819f24d0@googlegroups.com> <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me> <784f741a-e2b9-45db-be4d-3dadc905b18a@googlegroups.com> <p9762o$84t$1@dont-email.me> <87h8p3su3v.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <5vcgbdd50m1env3q2i322i7dj64gju123u@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.96.5 with SMTP id u5mr1756307wmb.14.1522031715088; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 19:35:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.199.141 with SMTP id x135ls943137wmf.10.gmail; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 19:35:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.129.133 with SMTP id c127mr1670429wmd.13.1522031714494; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 19:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!l13ni1017wmd.0!nntp.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Charles Richmond <nume...@aquaporin4.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:35:18 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <p99m91$2j8$1@dont-email.me> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <nejuadhun30mn34o7tvqbs6fhaq9d42m9m@4ax.com> <dce9e1b3-38a3-4815-b8e3-f788819f24d0@googlegroups.com> <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me> <784f741a-e2b9-45db-be4d-3dadc905b18a@googlegroups.com> <p9762o$84t$1@dont-email.me> <87h8p3su3v.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <5vcgbdd50m1env3q2i322i7dj64gju123u@4ax.com> Reply-To: nume...@aquaporin4.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 02:35:14 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="142e05b03f7ec214121f12591cc05bf6"; logging-data="2664"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YJYpu82pHCFDps39PNzpEuiygKW48RjY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 In-Reply-To: <5vcgbdd50m1env3q2i322i7dj64gju123u@4ax.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:iLpOKqfbxrAb/Ot63UR+Hi56YMc= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit