Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621310Re: Old word processors
From: hanc...
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 19:20
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 19:20
33 lines
3006 bytes
3006 bytes
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 9:02:50 PM UTC-4, Bob Eager wrote: > Not to mention the 'Near Letter Quality' dot matrix printers. I bought a > Canon PW1080A printer in 1984 that had that. 9 pins (I think). The > printer did a line using the 9 pins, then reversed the carriage and moved > the paper up by a fractional amount. It then printed back the other way, > filling in the gaps between the dots. There was a separate bold function. At that time, the expected standard for business correspondence was a letter typed on an electric typewriter, preferably with a film ribbon, and preferably by a Selectric. A great many businesses had that, but others (or some lower offices within a business) had a plain electric. Some still used manual typewriters for low-end functions. Anyway, letters printed on a dot-matrix printer, especially the early models, looked crappy and didn't make a good impression on the recipient. But later, better printers came out and so many people by then were using computers that it became acceptable. Also, bubble-jet and laser printers were coming out, too. We had some 9 pin Okidata printers that looked horrid, but I think they were cheap to buy. In the 286/386 era, I got a Panasonic 1124i dot matrix printer that had very nice output in NLQ mode. Even looked good in draft mode. It had several built in fonts that looked like various common Selectric fonts. Easily controlled by DOS or QBASIC commands. Unfortunately, it no longer works; I wish I still had it for correspondence.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ab03294d-9486-4bc9-b732-25416dc85f00@googlegroups.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c39ni834qta.0!nntp.google.com!k53no195814qtc.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8j9en$lh3$1@dont-email.me> <87d1024d2r.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8kdg2$afc$1@reader2.panix.com> <fh5s5pFkiosU1@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.55.73.149 with SMTP id w143mr10162837qka.12.1521832810099; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:20:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.200.52.104 with SMTP id v37ls5745958qtb.10.gmail; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:20:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.200.45.51 with SMTP id n48mr7015604qta.18.1521832809334; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:20:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.173.80 with SMTP id w77mr886770vke.13.1521832809096; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c39ni834qta.0!nntp.google.com!k53no195814qtc.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:20:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <fh5s5pFkiosU1@mid.individual.net> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198 References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8j9en$lh3$1@dont-email.me> <87d1024d2r.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <p8kdg2$afc$1@reader2.panix.com> <fh5s5pFkiosU1@mid.individual.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <ab03294d-9486-4bc9-b732-25416dc85f00@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Old word processors From: hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 19:20:09 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit