Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621290Re: Old word processors
From: Peter Flass
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:52
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:52
46 lines
3170 bytes
3170 bytes
Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2018-03-16, Andreas Kohlbach <a...@spamfence.net> wrote: >> I was writing a blog article about early word processors and spreadsheets >> <https://news-commentaries.blogspot.com/2018/03/history-of-wordprocessors-and-spread.html> >> but only covered early 8-Bit micros. Assuming Electric Pencil was the >> first while WordStar or SuperCalc (spreadsheet) only really became famous >> in the early days of the late 70s to early 80s. >> >> I know that in offices before that era type writers were used, even if an >> IBM Selectric could ease the work. But they were hardware. They hadn't a >> display (monitor) to edit text and only when done print it out. > > You might like some of these; > > http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/xerox860/index.html > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_(software) > (Look at the name of the second co-developer and ask yourself "Who wrote > MS Word?") > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Star > > http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/xerox-8010/ > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVw86emu-K0 > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Daybreak > > And once you've marvelled at what was being done by Xerox nearly 50 years > ago, ask yourself where it all went wrong? I think the Digibarn article says it, something like " few people know about the Xerox 860." They had stuff that was ahead of it's time, but marketed it poorly. > (Xerox was last month subsumed > by its Japanese joint venture, Fuji Xerox). And yes, I worked for them for > some years, using (and in some cases programming) all the above systems. I > wish them well, since they still have a pension of mine! > -- Pete
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<864247377.542987424.914170.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni14957wmg.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <fh48sbFi67qU1@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.21.139 with SMTP id 133mr603459wmv.27.1521294768369; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.133.206 with SMTP id h197ls216212wmd.1.canary-gmail; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.192.9 with SMTP id q9mr626488wmf.20.1521294767506; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni14957wmg.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter Flass <peter...@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:47 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 46 Message-ID: <864247377.542987424.914170.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <fh48sbFi67qU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c8645708847150027751b9041093e1f9"; logging-data="1674"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SFCD5pTBsyVgcXQLIxhzm" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EkYsC1NP2pQV1XSNW/O0cfzPOp4= sha1:8hWhBy3SPdd/lWKoEB7k9sC0VwI= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit