🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621290

Re: Old word processors

#621290
From: Peter Flass
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:52
46 lines
3170 bytes
Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
> On 2018-03-16, Andreas Kohlbach <a...@spamfence.net> wrote:
>> I was writing a blog article about early word processors and spreadsheets
>> <https://news-commentaries.blogspot.com/2018/03/history-of-wordprocessors-and-spread.html>
>> but only covered early 8-Bit micros. Assuming Electric Pencil was the
>> first while WordStar or SuperCalc (spreadsheet) only really became famous
>> in the early days of the late 70s to early 80s.
>> 
>> I know that in offices before that era type writers were used, even if an
>> IBM Selectric could ease the work. But they were hardware. They hadn't a
>> display (monitor) to edit text and only when done print it out.
> 
> You might like some of these;
> 
> http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/xerox860/index.html
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_(software)
>    (Look at the name of the second co-developer and ask yourself "Who wrote
>    MS Word?")
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Star
> 
> http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/xerox-8010/
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVw86emu-K0
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Daybreak
> 
> And once you've marvelled at what was being done by Xerox nearly 50 years
> ago, ask yourself where it all went wrong? 

I think the Digibarn article says it, something like " few people know
about the Xerox 860." They had stuff that was ahead of it's time, but
marketed it poorly.


> (Xerox was last month subsumed
> by its Japanese joint venture, Fuji Xerox). And yes, I worked for them for
> some years, using (and in some cases programming) all the above systems. I
> wish them well, since they still have a pension of mine!
> 



-- 
Pete
Technical Details
Message-ID: <864247377.542987424.914170.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni14957wmg.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <fh48sbFi67qU1@mid.individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.21.139 with SMTP id 133mr603459wmv.27.1521294768369;        Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.28.133.206 with SMTP id h197ls216212wmd.1.canary-gmail; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.28.192.9 with SMTP id q9mr626488wmf.20.1521294767506;        Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni14957wmg.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter Flass <peter...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Old word processors
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:52:47 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <864247377.542987424.914170.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <fh48sbFi67qU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c8645708847150027751b9041093e1f9"; logging-data="1674"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SFCD5pTBsyVgcXQLIxhzm"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EkYsC1NP2pQV1XSNW/O0cfzPOp4= sha1:8hWhBy3SPdd/lWKoEB7k9sC0VwI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit