🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621282

Re: Old word processors

#621282
From: Dave Garland
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 02:10
43 lines
3369 bytes
On 3/16/2018 6:07 PM, Charles Richmond wrote:
> On 3/16/2018 4:30 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> Andreas Kohlbach <a...@spamfence.net> writes:
>>> I was writing a blog article about early word processors and 
>>> spreadsheets
>>> <https://news-commentaries.blogspot.com/2018/03/history-of-wordprocessors-and-spread.html> 
>>>
>>> but only covered early 8-Bit micros. Assuming Electric Pencil was the
>>> first while WordStar or SuperCalc (spreadsheet) only really became 
>>> famous
>>> in the early days of the late 70s to early 80s.
>>>
>>> I know that in offices before that era type writers were used, even 
>>> if an
>>> IBM Selectric could ease the work. But they were hardware. They 
>>> hadn't a
>>> display (monitor) to edit text and only when done print it out.
>>>
>>> Still I wonder if big machines like some IBM 360/370 did not have word
>>> processors... By word processor I do not mean any text editor. A word
>>> processor should at least be able to wrap a word into the next line 
>>> if it
>>> didn't fit into the current line. And had some markup for defining 
>>> a bold
>>> or italic character and sub- and superscript.
>>
>> UW (University of Waterloo) script.
>> Digital RUNOFF
>> Burroughs ADS (Automatic Documentation System).
>> troff
>>
>> all used markup sequences
>>
> 
> These things like RUNOFF are "text formaters", not word processors.  
> And IBM selectrics *are* typewriters.
> 
The MT/ST and MC/ST were not really "typewriters", they were 
standalone WP machines that included a selectric for IO. It's true 
that their capabilities were limited compared to later machines, but 
they could edit text (in a linear way, not random access), do word 
wrap, accept run-time insertions like mail merge (the operator 
manually provided the merge text), etc.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <p8htf7$p24$1@dont-email.me>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni12544wmi.0!nntp.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <CHWqC.2203$0v5.1771@fx31.iad> <p8hio6$pqc$1@dont-email.me>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.8.17 with SMTP id 17mr459754wmi.25.1521252648512;        Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.28.139.200 with SMTP id n191ls629519wmd.11.canary-gmail; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.28.239.16 with SMTP id n16mr448650wmh.23.1521252647785;        Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni12544wmi.0!nntp.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dave Garland <dave.g...@wizinfo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Old word processors
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 21:10:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <p8htf7$p24$1@dont-email.me>
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <CHWqC.2203$0v5.1771@fx31.iad> <p8hio6$pqc$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 02:10:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2645fbeda2f4497243aa81c196918a94"; logging-data="25668"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZIMAqI/jTMNW9TKBF4lpyv2e3e06e01c="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <p8hio6$pqc$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:V6tC99sdfzO0bwnqN0Sqrnd+JFQ=
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit