🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621280

Re: Old word processors

#621280
From: Carlos E.R.
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:09
33 lines
2743 bytes
On 2018-03-18 22:09, Andreas Kohlbach wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:15:01 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:
>>
>> Gene Wirchenko <ge...@telus.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:38:49 -0700, Peter Flass
>>> <peter...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> What's your distinction? I seem to recall that Wordstar wasn't WISIWIG. The
>>>> only difference between Wordstar and something like Script is what you use
>>>> for markup: control characters vs. dot-commands.
>>>
>>>      WordStar was WYSIWYG within the limits of a character-only
>>> terminal.
>>
>> Fixed-width characters with no bold or italic. I think it used attributes
>> like underline and reverse video to indicate bf and ital.
> 
> WordStar produced bold and thelike. I am also quite sure you could tell
> it to use proportional. Or even had to tell it to *not* use proportional
> but fixed-width. Of course it's up to the printer whether it can produce
> them.

I remember trying proportional but not what word processor it was;
probably WordStar. The problem was that the idea the computer had about
the exact size of the words was not the same as the printer had, so that
the result was not reliable.

I don't remember if WP 5.1 got it right or not (on my 9 pin pin printer).

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ekh6oe-k0l.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni36769wmg.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <CHWqC.2203$0v5.1771@fx31.iad> <p8hio6$pqc$1@dont-email.me> <677916128.542936055.350685.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vc9rad9uj6amehj33tkvt8rkmlit81jb77@4ax.com> <1921208017.543075055.244979.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <87r2oh146u.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.212.200 with SMTP id l191mr117372wmg.9.1521522729104;        Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.28.0.78 with SMTP id 75ls84406wma.4.gmail; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.28.50.68 with SMTP id y65mr119271wmy.11.1521522728172;        Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni36769wmg.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Old word processors
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 06:09:02 +0100
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <ekh6oe-k0l.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <CHWqC.2203$0v5.1771@fx31.iad> <p8hio6$pqc$1@dont-email.me> <677916128.542936055.350685.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vc9rad9uj6amehj33tkvt8rkmlit81jb77@4ax.com> <1921208017.543075055.244979.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <87r2oh146u.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net InxntYu+BVF6WtWAWl5+ZQMYBHX6JyDoqYVUFLUJmjL79lDwh4
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6eqewejYahxzIsx8eFT+yWV1dHM=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <87r2oh146u.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit