🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621045

Re: Why so many 6s and 8s in the 70s?

#621045
From: hanc...
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:56
37 lines
3825 bytes
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 8:48:56 PM UTC-4, rne...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 8:15:27 PM UTC-4, Dan Espen wrote:
> > If I ever read that the bits in my brain must have flipped.
> > I only encountered a 1400 character 1401 after I'd worked on them
> > for a few years.  I was surprised they made them that small.
> 
> Remember, "electronically programmable tabulator". I distinctly remember reading a sales brochure pushing that view. The idea was that (in computer terms) the thing would be programmed in machine language. Hence A for Add, S for Subtract, M for Move, and so on. Compared to the existing plug board programmable tabulators, 1400 characters of storage for data and program was huge.

Part of the IBM's goals was to meet European needs for a more
sophisticated tabulator, due to tougher banking demands in Europe.

The IBM history also notes the development of RPG for the 1401,
the book says it made it possible for former plugboard operators
to easily program the computer, more easily than in Autocoder or
SPS.  (RPG needed more memory).  As we know, RPG in fancier
versions became very popular on S/3 machines and their
descendants.  (I don't know about today and the "i" series.)





> > No disk on the 1460 I used, but the 1440 had disk.
> > The 1311 disk wasn't exactly huge.  1 meg per drive.
> 
> Agreed. But there was a big fixed disk random access unit (I do not remember the model number) which had a total capacity of several megabytes, more than you could get by hanging 1311's on a 1401. While a 1401 could run 1311's, a 1460 was required to operate this big beast.

Ironically, I think the book said the 1440 got disk before the
1401 did for marketing reasons.  I it said the 1440 turned out to
be a poor seller due to poor price/performance.

I believe the 14xx series eventually could support the big disk
drive (50 meg) developed for RAMAC.

I still wonder when the last 1401 emulator was turned off (or if
any are still running.  I'm guessing 1990s for Y2K, which is
what we did.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <336b93fb-b8cd-45ce-9fee-1bb673f93719@googlegroups.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c39ni998qta.0!nntp.google.com!k53no448995qtc.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <87sh9m9ny5.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <c63e7d1c-a4ac-45e3-8ec6-8be10e221dc6@googlegroups.com> <p7ptui$sgd$2@reader1.panix.com> <p7q6j4$6no$1@gal.iecc.com> <8edcc5c1-44cb-4f1e-9649-c10927b1f816@googlegroups.com> <d20c0cba-42ec-48ad-b891-a3f0b9c97d04@googlegroups.com> <p8hqd3$7j0$1@dont-email.me> <73be782b-604d-4170-a227-60d8affa0d81@googlegroups.com> <p8kb2u$ahg$1@dont-email.me> <b4e9eb64-90e5-44c6-8ec6-60c34a081167@googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.55.166.150 with SMTP id p144mr21780246qke.33.1521921396427;        Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.237.60.72 with SMTP id u8ls1659187qte.1.gmail; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.200.18.10 with SMTP id x10mr19941704qti.40.1521921395818;        Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.149.199 with SMTP id x190mr4025673vkd.11.1521921395650; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c39ni998qta.0!nntp.google.com!k53no448995qtc.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b4e9eb64-90e5-44c6-8ec6-60c34a081167@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198
References: <87sh9m9ny5.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <c63e7d1c-a4ac-45e3-8ec6-8be10e221dc6@googlegroups.com> <p7ptui$sgd$2@reader1.panix.com> <p7q6j4$6no$1@gal.iecc.com> <8edcc5c1-44cb-4f1e-9649-c10927b1f816@googlegroups.com> <d20c0cba-42ec-48ad-b891-a3f0b9c97d04@googlegroups.com> <p8hqd3$7j0$1@dont-email.me> <73be782b-604d-4170-a227-60d8affa0d81@googlegroups.com> <p8kb2u$ahg$1@dont-email.me> <b4e9eb64-90e5-44c6-8ec6-60c34a081167@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <336b93fb-b8cd-45ce-9fee-1bb673f93719@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Why so many 6s and 8s in the 70s?
From: hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:56:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit