🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #620824

Re: Implementation of a Turing Machine?

#620824
From: Jon Elson
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:59
23 lines
2825 bytes
Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote:


> It is particularly fascinating that a Turing Machine could
> have been built with the technology available at the time
> it was first postualted (1935?)
A simple Turing machine could have definitely been built in 1935, using 
vacuum tubes and relays.  But, when Turing proposed it, is was the intention 
that it be really "stupid" to prove the point that all computers that 
posessed certain abilities were equivalent, ie. they could solve the same 
problems, but not necessarily in the same elapsed time.

So, when all this electronic hardware was expensive and cumbersome, it made 
more sense to use it to make practical computers.

Although the Atanasoff-Berry "computer" was not built until, I think, 
1938-39, there was nothing in it that was not available a decade before 
that.  (I say "computer", because by the Turing definition, it was not 
stored-program and could only skip instructions, no branching was possible.)
But, with the technology in the ABC, it COULD have been expanded to a stored 
program computer with branching.

Jon
Technical Details
Message-ID: <0pudnX2zSfH6thbHnZ2dnUU7-IvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!s63ni4353itb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <p6d0na$o5g$1@dont-email.me> <c0vk8dl5m89kives0l6qto4p2dtjp6m5s7@4ax.com> <p6e4bt$s3q$1@dont-email.me>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.107.166.68 with SMTP id p65mr16240144ioe.71.1519070060991;        Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:54:20 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.36.26.211 with SMTP id 202ls948818iti.10.canary-gmail; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:54:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.36.95.77 with SMTP id r74mr12477984itb.35.1519070060060;        Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!s63ni4353itb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:54:14 -0600
From: Jon Elson <jme...@wustl.edu>
Reply-To: jme...@wustl.edu
Organization: Washington University
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:59:03 -0600
User-Agent: KNode/4.8.5
Subject: Re: Implementation of a Turing Machine?
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
References: <p6d0na$o5g$1@dont-email.me> <c0vk8dl5m89kives0l6qto4p2dtjp6m5s7@4ax.com> <p6e4bt$s3q$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0pudnX2zSfH6thbHnZ2dnUU7-IvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 23
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-PNOXovClmHPrEWlpZxePP//uYjsGnHhwuG2QZto8BNiOwy3FcaTqT/b/piS6sFTdWgvBbcNHsa8WaGg!D08aBF/pVRQRM2A7Hvg7M62v6awZ4/ZcKSTYk8ZtvJwkDCNTDAnKFnG6DtgE02yyWCW+5M0NzdV5!EA==
X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2338
X-Original-Bytes: 2276
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit