Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #620233Re: Soon, the Only Alternatives to Windows Server will be open-source
From: JimP
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:42
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:42
42 lines
3283 bytes
3283 bytes
On 5 Feb 2018 10:31:58 GMT, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >On 2018-02-04, Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: >> Just saw this news item: >> >> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/29/farewell_to_macos_server/ >> >> I didn't really know there _was_ a MacOS Server, and so I can't blame Apple too >> much for deciding the effort to maintain it isn't worth the expense... their >> hardware is too expensive to be a rational choice for people wishing to set up a >> server in most cases. >> >> If, however, one has quite a few Macs on the desktop, one would like the server >> for them to be as secure as they are, and to be operable by people whose training >> is with the Macintosh, so this decision could well cost them with the corporate >> desktop. > >About 5 or 6 years ago, I decided that it would be much better if the >underground Mac community in $(MEGABANK) were actually supported, rather >than using their machines for Bank work 'illicitly' (some of them had >even imaged their provided Windows laptops and were running the images >in a VM on their Macbooks!) The bank's official stance on Macs was short >and stupid; no Macs. > >So, we set up a meeting with Apple to discuss this. To say they were >indifferent towards our requirements would be to grossly exaggerate their >level of interest. They simply didn't give a damn, presumably because >they sold mountains of machines into the retail market and don't need >troublesome IT departments. > >And it wasn't that we weren't going to buy that many machines, because >when we subsequently went back to discuss migrating our Blackberry >estate to iPhone (which would have meant that we would be buying ~300,000 >iPhones) they didn't give a damn, then, either. > >Their attitude was "this is the product, take it or leave it". > >(Needless to say, whenever I tell this story, I get accused of lying by >some Apple fanboi, so if you're thinking of doing that, please don't.) I liked the Apple ][, but that is when I learned Apple didn't like their customers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a9kg7d1o18sv389e4o7ombr9ao7tta9ooo@4ax.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!u51ni137qtk.1!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6References:
<42515f6e-6ba7-4977-933a-070cf6e52c0c@googlegroups.com> <fdqq4uFm3hfU2@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.55.55.84 with SMTP id e81mr8998520qka.3.1517834594480; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:43:14 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.200.11.79 with SMTP id m15ls4362789qti.7.gmail; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:43:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.200.26.43 with SMTP id v40mr10720956qtj.24.1517834593578; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:43:13 -0800 (PST) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!u51ni137qtk.1!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6 From: JimP <solo...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Soon, the Only Alternatives to Windows Server will be open-source Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 06:42:59 -0600 Organization: NewsGuy.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <a9kg7d1o18sv389e4o7ombr9ao7tta9ooo@4ax.com> References: <42515f6e-6ba7-4977-933a-070cf6e52c0c@googlegroups.com> <fdqq4uFm3hfU2@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pa2cdb4d641f7af0121eb8af5feed1ba34100196e4b9ef799.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 X-Received-Bytes: 2799 X-Received-Body-CRC: 395913682 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit