Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #620164Re: Important US technology companies sold to foreigners
From: Dan Espen
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 22:21
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 22:21
54 lines
3881 bytes
3881 bytes
hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com writes: > On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 1:39:07 PM UTC-5, Dan Espen wrote: > >> > AT&T's management did not destroy Bell Labs. It was destroyed by the >> > lawyers who forced the breakup of AT&T. > >> Actually, the breakup was proposed by AT&T. >> They may or may not have lost the anti-trust suit. >> At the time, I thought not. >> Within the company, the story was that AT&T would be free to enter >> the computer maker market thereby becoming the next big thing. > > IMHO, at the time AT&T made the compromise decision (circa 1980), > their path seemed generally pretty reasonable, except, perhaps, > for keeping Western Electric. > > I think given the atmosphere of the time--there was a lot of anti-Bell > feeling among regulators, legislatures, Judge Greene*, DOJ, and > newcomers who wanted a piece of the market, that AT&T was doomed > in court. > > * Oslin's book says Greene was clearly out to 'get' the Bell System-- > he thought it was an evil monopoly and he sought a reform agenda. > >> Ridiculous. > > Wanting to get into the computer business was certainly a good > decision by AT&T. The company had outstanding talent and > experience in electronics and software. It had the name. > It had Bell Labs and W/E to develop and manufacture stuff. > Unfortunately, like so many other large American companies, > it just didn't 'click' in the computer marketplace. With no reasonable sales force and lots of very able competition, they didn't stand a chance. I felt that way at the time. > Remember, IBM was terrified in the 1950s of big players > like RCA and General Electric who had so much more than > IBM did, yet IBM prevailed. > > Indeed, at the time, everyone thought AT&T would give IBM > stiff competition in computers (and IBM would give AT&T > competition in communications). > > For whatever reasons, AT&T didn't succeed at computers. IBM went though an anti-trust case at around the same time. There was every reason to believe AT&T would have the same outcome. -- Dan Espen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<p55clc$849$2@dont-email.me>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g8ni1919qtk.0!nntp.google.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!lightspeed.eweka!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<2c5ea5c8-9317-4a35-8775-d736ebbb6327@googlegroups.com> <87607fce56.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <kq7a7d1sjsqnltmkm789ql5r38s36ecnc9@4ax.com> <p54ndg$g3s$1@pechter.eternal-september.org> <8qtb7d5n9t5h883cclkl1csd1f103snnkb@4ax.com> <p54vka$b5v$1@dont-email.me> <9d71bdb2-2096-4bf3-996c-7108b3675c61@googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.55.72.142 with SMTP id v136mr31072070qka.48.1517696493809; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:33 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.200.16.15 with SMTP id z15ls2753299qti.10.gmail; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.200.70.18 with SMTP id p18mr5124509qtn.18.1517696493187; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:33 -0800 (PST) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g8ni1919qtk.0!nntp.google.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!lightspeed.eweka!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dan Espen <dan1...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Important US technology companies sold to foreigners Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 17:21:32 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <p55clc$849$2@dont-email.me> References: <2c5ea5c8-9317-4a35-8775-d736ebbb6327@googlegroups.com> <87607fce56.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <kq7a7d1sjsqnltmkm789ql5r38s36ecnc9@4ax.com> <p54ndg$g3s$1@pechter.eternal-september.org> <8qtb7d5n9t5h883cclkl1csd1f103snnkb@4ax.com> <p54vka$b5v$1@dont-email.me> <9d71bdb2-2096-4bf3-996c-7108b3675c61@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="898b79f97d20989371da32aa09b94c62"; logging-data="8329"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18f4HnvTsi3BzlXs3rz9Cv8KMWTnGoWrcM=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5e8O9FZJD7oZ5gc/znT2O7Q1KhM= X-Received-Body-CRC: 406480574 X-Received-Bytes: 3382 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit