🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #620164

Re: Important US technology companies sold to foreigners

#620164
From: Dan Espen
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 22:21
54 lines
3881 bytes
hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com writes:

> On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 1:39:07 PM UTC-5, Dan Espen wrote:
>
>> > AT&T's management did not destroy Bell Labs.  It was destroyed by the
>> > lawyers who forced the breakup of AT&T.
>
>> Actually, the breakup was proposed by AT&T.
>> They may or may not have lost the anti-trust suit.
>> At the time, I thought not.
>> Within the company, the story was that AT&T would be free to enter
>> the computer maker market thereby becoming the next big thing.
>
> IMHO, at the time AT&T made the compromise decision (circa 1980),
> their path seemed generally pretty reasonable, except, perhaps,
> for keeping Western Electric.  
>
> I think given the atmosphere of the time--there was a lot of anti-Bell
> feeling among regulators, legislatures, Judge Greene*, DOJ, and 
> newcomers who wanted a piece of the market, that AT&T was doomed 
> in court.
>
> * Oslin's book says Greene was clearly out to 'get' the Bell System--
> he thought it was an evil monopoly and he sought a reform agenda.
>
>> Ridiculous.
>
> Wanting to get into the computer business was certainly a good
> decision by AT&T.  The company had outstanding talent and 
> experience in electronics and software.  It had the name.
> It had Bell Labs and W/E to develop and manufacture stuff.  
> Unfortunately, like so many other large American companies,
> it just didn't 'click' in the computer marketplace.

With no reasonable sales force and lots of very able
competition, they didn't stand a chance.

I felt that way at the time.

> Remember, IBM was terrified in the 1950s of big players
> like RCA and General Electric who had so much more than
> IBM did, yet IBM prevailed.
>
> Indeed, at the time, everyone thought AT&T would give IBM
> stiff competition in computers (and IBM would give AT&T
> competition in communications).
>
> For whatever reasons, AT&T didn't succeed at computers.

IBM went though an anti-trust case at around the same time.
There was every reason to believe AT&T would have the same outcome.

-- 
Dan Espen
Technical Details
Message-ID: <p55clc$849$2@dont-email.me>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g8ni1919qtk.0!nntp.google.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!lightspeed.eweka!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <2c5ea5c8-9317-4a35-8775-d736ebbb6327@googlegroups.com> <87607fce56.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <kq7a7d1sjsqnltmkm789ql5r38s36ecnc9@4ax.com> <p54ndg$g3s$1@pechter.eternal-september.org> <8qtb7d5n9t5h883cclkl1csd1f103snnkb@4ax.com> <p54vka$b5v$1@dont-email.me> <9d71bdb2-2096-4bf3-996c-7108b3675c61@googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.55.72.142 with SMTP id v136mr31072070qka.48.1517696493809;        Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:33 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.200.16.15 with SMTP id z15ls2753299qti.10.gmail; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.200.70.18 with SMTP id p18mr5124509qtn.18.1517696493187;        Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g8ni1919qtk.0!nntp.google.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!lightspeed.eweka!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dan Espen <dan1...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Important US technology companies sold to foreigners
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 17:21:32 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <p55clc$849$2@dont-email.me>
References: <2c5ea5c8-9317-4a35-8775-d736ebbb6327@googlegroups.com> <87607fce56.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <kq7a7d1sjsqnltmkm789ql5r38s36ecnc9@4ax.com> <p54ndg$g3s$1@pechter.eternal-september.org> <8qtb7d5n9t5h883cclkl1csd1f103snnkb@4ax.com> <p54vka$b5v$1@dont-email.me> <9d71bdb2-2096-4bf3-996c-7108b3675c61@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="898b79f97d20989371da32aa09b94c62"; logging-data="8329"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18f4HnvTsi3BzlXs3rz9Cv8KMWTnGoWrcM="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5e8O9FZJD7oZ5gc/znT2O7Q1KhM=
X-Received-Body-CRC: 406480574
X-Received-Bytes: 3382
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit