Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #521Re: User's do the darnedest things
From: a... Al Thompson
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1989 21:41
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1989 21:41
38 lines
2691 bytes
2691 bytes
In article <129...@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> landman@sun.UUCP (Howard A. Landman x61391) writes: >In article <18...@odin.SGI.COM> ci...@bananaPC.sgi.com (Dave Ciemiewicz) writes: [...} > >O.K., now I was getting mad. A year or so back I blew out the woofer on an >Advent speaker. For some reason I had the corpse of the woofer on a shelf. >The magnet on the woofer was capable of lifting MANY pounds of metal. Prying >a nail off this magnet requires BOTH HANDS. I lugged the woofer into the >living room (didn't want it in the same ROOM as my precious backup disks!) >and rubbed the DISK all over the MAGNET. > >You guessed it. Put the disk back in the drive. All the data was still there. > >I gave up and reformatted the disk. > >MORAL: It takes a lot more than a medium-size magnet to trash most of today's >floppy disks. (On the other hand, don't press your luck, and don't blame it >on me if you do and it doesn't work out.) About ten years ago there was a lot of anxiety about the possibility of technicians wiping out data by carrying magnetized screwdrivers near discs and tapes. The National Bureau of Standards did a study, and found exactly the same thing you found (only they did it quantitatively. I can't remember all the details, but holding one of those really strong horseshoe magnets to the surface of a tape on a reel caused no loss of data. There was some attenuation, but no real loss. They were able to cause some loss near the front of the tape (first fourteen feet I think, but don't quote me) by some other dirty, and improbable, trick. The conclusion was the same as yours, you've really got to whack it before it breaks. Side issue: In Tom Clancy's latest techno-thriller, "Clear and Present Danger", one of the villains uses a refrigerator magnet to destroy the incriminating contents of a floppy. The FBI calls in a long haired consultant (why are all his computer "consultants" long haired?) to attempt a reconstruction. It's partially successful because the spook didn't use the magnet correctly. Now Clancy is usually pretty careful, but this time he blew it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<44951@bu-cs.BU.EDU>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!mit-eddie!bu-cs!artReferences:
<1820@odin.SGI.COM> <129435@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!mit-eddie!bu-cs!art From: a...@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Al Thompson) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: User's do the darnedest things Message-ID: <44951@bu-cs.BU.EDU> Date: 19 Dec 89 21:41:36 GMT References: <1820@odin.SGI.COM> <129435@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Reply-To: a...@cs.bu.edu (Al Thompson) Followup-To: alt.folklore.computers Organization: Boston University Lines: 38 Posted: Tue Dec 19 22:41:36 1989 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit