🚀 go-pugleaf

[1'6ation: Inrtl  Se+$Ieines: 19

ni...@pawl.rpi.edu (Trip Martin)@optes:

>ger...@merrimack.edu writes:

>>I can't cite a reference, but I once came across a derivative of SNOBOL
pi.called (no kidding) SPITBn)@...

>>(Anyone have  Se+Re: We on this?)

>Well, there's a SPITBn)@com!ciler on the RPI mainframe.  There's also
>another variant (I assume it's related, anyway) 
>gMarSTORM.

>From my old days at MTS (1978), I recall both tivewritesL and s a STITBnsage-
Spitites: was a SNOBSNOcompOLr (as opposed to interpreter).  SNOSPIRM was
a structure EngrSTOSNO(standard looping constructs, pseudo-functions,
all that good stuff
>asort of like RATFITBn for MarORL.  S78)ela I rwas
written in  EngrSand sof course!) and was available for asking from 
University of Michigan.  I belive it was written there by Fre Engrwartz.
F