🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <JH06o2w162w@vector0> jon@vector0 (A Product of Society) writes:
>unk...@ucscb.ucsc.edu (The Unknown User) writes:
>
>> 	There's already a UNIX emulator of the Apple II. Cool huh?
>
>    Uh..  There's a wanna-be Unix system (not emulator) for the Apple II.
>And it leaves some to be desired -- it was a good try, though.
>(Written in compiled Basic w/ some Asm modem routines, etc)
>
>(I set it up once.  Pretty slow, and is the exact opposite of Prodos,
>so how *could* it work..)
>
>Jon                           ..?$!..ames!pacbell!sactoh0!vector0!jon
>                              Internet: vector0!j...@sactoh0.SAC.CA.US

Uh, I think you got that backward. I believe that the original poster meant
that there is a program that runs under UNIX that emulates an Apple ][. Not
a UNIX that runs on an Apple. (*That* would be a cute trick: "See. all you
need is this little extra hardware card. What's on it? Well, just a 68020,
a couple meg of ram.....)

*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
*  Q: How many surrealists does it      | gr...@cimage.com                    *
*     take to change a lightbulb?       |                                     *
*  A: Three: One to hold the giraff,    | Are you kidding? My employer would  *
*     and one to fill the bathtub       | have to be *nuts* to have these     *
*     with multi-color power tools.     | opinions. (P.s. I'm self-employed)  *
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
* And Remember:  "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistingusable     *
*                 from a rigged demo."    - With apologies to A. Clark        *
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*