🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #4362

Re: Monitor Damage by Programming (was Stupid programming errors)

#4362
From: Ben Scott
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 1990 03:31
43 lines
3141 bytes
In article <1803@utoday.UUCP> wagner@utoday.UUCP (Mitch Wagner) writes:
>In article <1990Sep12....@tandem.com> ji...@tandem.com (Jim Lyon) writes:
>#The year was 1984.  The machine was one of the original Compaq portables
>#(now frequently called "luggable" -- expect one arm to get substantially
>#longer than the other if you ever have to carry one across O'Hare airport).
>
>It is a marvelous feature still used in portable computers today. When you 

  I had many good years of service out of my trusty SX-64 Bodybuilder model
personal computer.  My spine was probably only compressed about an inch, at
least permanently - the rest has sprung back over the years.  (why ANYONE
would put a 27 pound heat sink on the back of a machine which already has
a metal case...)

>by the time you've done all that, they weigh as much as a refrigerator
>which could feed a family of eight!
>
>Where does the extra mass come from?

Ah, well, this is a complex and subtle question.  It has to do with the
interrelation between time and matter, called Specific Relativity.  You 
see, while you are transporting a computer in a gravitational field, the
molecular bonds of most metals and semiconductors gain weight due to 
plasmic pseudo-hyperbonding.  Thus, the actual time spent in motion 
relative to an observer relaxing at rest becomes one of the variables in
the weight function.  So, in fact, no additional "mass" as such is 
involved, but local space tends to warp itself roughly around your power 
supply transformer.  The obvious result of this is that, to you, your
arm seems to be getting weaker over time - but it's all merely an 
unfortunate result of the physics of computing.

And no, I will not post a disclaimer - the ONLY reason I flunked physics
twice is that my instructor had an unhealty obsession with exam results.
 
.                            <<<<Infinite K>>>>

--
.---------------------------------------------------------------------------.
|Ben Scott, professional goof-off and consultant at The Raster Image, Denver|
|Amiga UUCP node domain: bsc...@vila.denver.co.us Else: bsc...@nyx.cs.du.edu|
|FIDO point address 1:104/421.2, or call the Arvada 68K BBS at (303)424-9831|
|"Don't embarrass us..."  "Have I ever?" - Buckaroo Banzai  | *AMIGA POWER* |
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------'
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2111@nyx.UUCP>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!isis!nyx!bscott
References: <ben.2630@epmooch.UUCP> <3061.26e54065@cc.helsinki.fi> <7322@milton.u.washington.edu> <12727@asylum.SF.CA.US> <1990Sep12.221818

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!isis!nyx!bscott
From: bscott@nyx.UUCP (Ben Scott)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Monitor Damage by Programming (was Stupid programming errors)
Summary: Where the additional mass comes from...
Keywords: First-Hand Experience
Message-ID: <2111@nyx.UUCP>
Date: 20 Sep 90 03:31:53 GMT
References: <ben.2630@epmooch.UUCP> <3061.26e54065@cc.helsinki.fi> <7322@milton.u.washington.edu> <12727@asylum.SF.CA.US> <1990Sep12.221818
Reply-To: bscott@nyx.UUCP (Peter Breznay)
Followup-To: alt.physics.funny
Organization: Public Access Unix - University of Denver
Lines: 43
Posted: Thu Sep 20 04:31:53 1990
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit