🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #21274

Re: Filesystem vs file system

#21274
From: erc... Sam Wilson
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1992 13:13
22 lines
1231 bytes
cfla...@nrao.edu (Chris Flatters,208,7209,homephone) writes:
> In article 7309@ukw.uucp, lupe@ukw.uucp (Lupe Christoph) writes:
> > ...
> >It just did a bit of research (this is SunOS 4.1.2):
> >   :
> >   :
> >This is 81% for "file system", 19% for "filesystem".
> >
> >What does *your* vendor say?
> 
> Better than allowing vendors to set terminology standards: check what POSIX
> standard uses.  IEEE 1003.1 sanctifies the term "file system", with a space.

But isn't the function of a standards body to make its standards just
that tiny, little bit different from what went before? Examples:
Ethernet and IEEE 802.3, Unix and POSIX etc etc. 

[For the serious - the rationale is that then the original developers
   don't have a commercial lead whenthe standard is published.]


Sam
Technical Details
Message-ID: <20760@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!ercm20
References: <1992Apr27.204245.5868@nrao.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!ercm20
From: erc...@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sam Wilson)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Filesystem vs file system
Message-ID: <20760@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 29 Apr 92 13:13:36 GMT
References: <1992Apr27.204245.5868@nrao.edu>
Organization: Edinburgh University
Lines: 22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit