Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #1493Re: Stupid Professor Tricks
From: George D. Nincehelser
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 1990 01:49
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 1990 01:49
55 lines
3186 bytes
3186 bytes
In article <10...@ttidca.TTI.COM> holl...@ttidcb.tti.com (The Polymath) writes: >In article <1990Feb28.2...@athena.mit.edu> ers...@athena.mit.edu (Ellen R. Spertus) writes: >}... to try to keep >}students from reusing papers, they kept a file of old junior themes ... > >}... The teacher told us the department was considering making >}students turn in the floppy disk they did their work on. He couldn't >}understand why the students thought this idea was funny. > >Neither can I. Yes, the students can keep a copy of the disk. So? >Nothing kept the students from making copies of their note cards and old >themes, either. The point is the department can build a machine readable >database of papers. That would make copy detection _much_ easier -- which >is the whole point. > >Sounds more like a stupid student trick to me. > ARGH! Unless this was the computer science department (or a very progressive English department) I doubt that they were planning to do copy detection. I can see it now! 100 disks handed in: several different physical sizes, several different OS formats (for each size), and several different file formats (for each OS). Yeah, there are solutions to this problem, but none are real elegant. The main point of handing in note-cards is not to prevent copying. Educators (the good ones at least) are trying to make the students go through a tried-and-true process of writing a research paper, not to catch cheaters. I'm sure many students think that the note-card issues is to stop them from cheating. They, like all young people, sometimes fail to see the big picture. I sure would have thought like them, but not now. I found the folklore humorous for two reasons: 1) the educator got lost in technology and 2) the students thought they were really going to get away with something. Handing in disks in lieu of note-cards is silly unless it can document the research process in some way. Even if it could, would the educator be able to read the format? Handing in disks as machine readable copies of papers is silly, too, unless the department is willing and able to handle the problem of varying formats. -- / George D. Nincehelser \ uunet!swbatl!george \ / / Southwestern Bell Telephone \ Phone: (314) 235-6544 \ / / / Advanced Technology Laboratory \ Fax: (314) 235-5797 \ / / / /\ 1010 Pine, St. Louis, MO 63101 \ de asini umbra disceptare \
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1217@swbatl.UUCP>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!swbatl!georgeReferences:
<9002242148.AA01289@jade.berkeley.edu> <1990Feb27.150521.24088@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1990Feb28.223926.18117@athena.mit.edu> <10396@ttidca.TTI.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wuarchive!swbatl!george From: george@swbatl.UUCP (George D. Nincehelser) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Stupid Professor Tricks Message-ID: <1217@swbatl.UUCP> Date: 4 Mar 90 01:49:06 GMT References: <9002242148.AA01289@jade.berkeley.edu> <1990Feb27.150521.24088@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1990Feb28.223926.18117@athena.mit.edu> <10396@ttidca.TTI.COM> Reply-To: george@swbatl.UUCP (George D. Nincehelser) Organization: Advanced Technology Laboratory - Southwestern Bell Telephone Lines: 55 Posted: Sun Mar 4 02:49:06 1990 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit