Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #121721Re: Honeywell 200
From: Julian Thomas
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00
24 lines
1555 bytes
1555 bytes
In <34818B2D...@monmouth.com>, on 11/30/97 at 10:50 AM, The Bakers <mba...@monmouth.com> said: ::Sounds like the machine used the "old" character set mappings (as were ::usually found on 026 keypunches) while you had the newer 029 keypunches ::with the newer EBCDIC mappings. Just a guess. Not quite. The commercial character set was distinct from the scientific set in the 026 era, the code points were the same but what was printed differed. I don't remember all of them now, but the sci ) was mapped to the same code point as the square blob in commercial. When 360 came out with ebcdic, the dual mapping was done away with - at least for these characters. I don't remember much about the H200 - worked on the D1000, the H800, and the H400. Wasn't the 200 originally designed for process control? -- Julian & Mary Jane Thomas j...@epix.net http://www.epix.net/~jt In the beautiful Finger Lakes Wine Country of New York State! -------------------------------------------------- One man's Windows are another man's walls.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3482d693$1$wg$mr2ice@news.epix.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<65g3r9$8gg@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <347F914C.F8CFC233@monmouth.com> <65qhc1$q3f@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <34818B2D.6897B381@monmouth.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: "Julian Thomas" <j...@epix.net> Subject: Re: Honeywell 200 Date: 1997/12/01 Message-ID: <3482d693$1$wg$mr2ice@news.epix.net> X-Deja-AN: 294217689 References: <65g3r9$8gg@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <347F914C.F8CFC233@monmouth.com> <65qhc1$q3f@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <34818B2D.6897B381@monmouth.com> Organization: epix Internet Services Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit